Until now I’ve published the number of the bias written in order of bias (only the most biased, from the 28.02 of Ece Esen to the 8.82 of Maira Abasova, with all the value of the bias but without the indication of the competition, so you need to work for link the bias to the competition, and finally with all the bias in all the competitions). In this way you can find easily the competitions in which there was the most biased judgments, but if you wanted to know if a judge was biased in only a competition or if for him is normal to give higher marks to his compatriots, it’s difficult.

If you need an explanation on how I’ve calculated the bias you can read here.

More recently I’ve published the average bias for all the judges in the last four years. I’ve published the data in this way because with a summary can be easy to see who is the most biased, but also because I needed to work less if I published only the summary. But I’ve decided that it’s not enough. If I want that my data can’t be considered biased, I need that anyone can see them and, if he want, can check them number by number.

For all that I know, the numbers are correct, but it’s possible that I’ve made some unintentional mistakes. If you find one, I would like to know it in order to correct the tables.

I will make a lot of screenshots, so I don’t know how many posts I’ll need to publish all the data. These are the first judges, in alphabetical order: